HW3
From 0506Topology
| # | Week of... | Links (edit) |
|---|---|---|
| Fall | ||
| 1 | Sep 12 | About, Tue, Thu, Std2Disc |
| 2 | Sep 19 | Tue, Thu, HW1, 14 Sets |
| 3 | Sep 26 | Tue, Thu, Photo |
| 4 | Oct 3 | Tue, Thu |
| 5 | Oct 10 | HW2, Tue, Thu |
| 6 | Oct 17 | Tue, Thu, HW3 |
| 7 | Oct 24 | Mon, Tue, Thu |
| 8 | Oct 31 | Tue, Thu, HW4 |
| 9 | Nov 7 | TE1, Tue, Thu |
| 10 | Nov 14 | Tue, Thu, HW5 |
| 11 | Nov 21 | Tue, Thu |
| 12 | Nov 28 | Tue, Thu, HW6 |
| 13 | Dec 5 | Tue, Thu |
| E | Dec 12 | TE2 |
| Spring | ||
| 14 | Jan 9 | Tue, IT83, Thu, HW7 |
| 15 | Jan 16 | Tue, Thu |
| 16 | Jan 23 | Tue, HW8, Thu |
| 17 | Jan 30 | Tue, Thu |
| 18 | Feb 6 | TE3, Tue, Thu |
| 19 | Feb 13 | Tue, Thu |
| R | Feb 20 | |
| 20 | Feb 27 | Tue, Thu, HW9 |
| 21 | Mar 6 | Tue, Thu, HW10 |
| 22 | Mar 13 | Tue, Thu |
| 23 | Mar 20 | Tue, Thu, HW11 |
| 24 | Mar 27 | Tue, Thu |
| 25 | Apr 3 | Tue, Thu, HW12 |
| 26 | Apr 10 | Tue, Thu |
| Study | Apr 17 | Office Hours |
| Exams | Apr 24 | Final, PM |
Homework Assignment 3
Required reading. Read, reread and rereread your notes to this point, and make sure that you really, really really, really really really understand everything in them. Do the same every week! Also, read all of Munkres chapter 5.
Solve the following problems. (But submit only the underlined ones). In Munkres' book, problems 2, 4, 6, 7 (read about "totally disconnected" on page 152), 9 (for
) and 10 on pages 241-242.
Just for fun.
- Compact Hausdorff topologies are "in perfect balance". Indeed, show that if
is a compact Hausdorff topology on a set X and
is either bigger or smaller than
, then
is either not compact or not Hausdorff.
- What is the cardinality of
? Is it countable? As big as the reals? Bigger? Hint. First find surprisingly small dense sets in
and in [0,1][0,1].
Due date. This assignment is due at the end of our class on Thursday, November 3, 2005.
Above the line, edit only if you are sure.
Feel free to edit below the line.
| Table of contents |
Problems for submission
38, Problem 2, p. 241
- Show that the bounded continuous function
defined by
cannot be extended to the compactification of Example 3. Define an imbedding
such that the functions
,
, and
are all extendable to the compactification induced by
.
38, Problem 4, p. 241
- Let
be an arbitrary compactification of
; let
be the Stone-Cech compactification. Show there is a continuous surjective closed map
that equals the identity on
.
38, Problem 6, p. 242
- Let
be completely regular. Show that
is connected if and only if
is connected. [Hint: If
is a separation of
, let
for
and
for
.]
38, Problem 7, p. 242
Let
be a discrete space; consider the space
.
- Show that if
, then
and
are disjoint, where the closures are taken in
.
- Show that if
is open in
, then
is open in
.
- Show that
is totally disconnected.
38, Problem 10, p. 242
We have constructed a correspondence
that assigns, to each completely regular space, its Stone-Cech compactification. Now let us assign, to each continuous map
of completely regular spaces, the unique continuous map
that extends the map
, where
is the inclusion map. Verify the following:
- If
is the identity map of
, then
is the identity map of
.
- If
and
, then
.
These properties tell us that the correspondence we have constructed is what is called a functor; it is a functor from the "category" of completely regular spaces and continuous maps of such spaces, to the "category" of compact Hausdorff spaces and continuous maps of such spaces.

